Evolutionists Fail Drone Survey

10,000 evolutionists were surveyed by Drone. They were asked 3 questions.

Question 1: Is evolution a force or an event?

Q1 Results: 99.6% of evolutionists replied that evolution is a force.

Sorry, Charlie. Darwin said that evolution is an event.

Question 2: Is natural selection a force or an event?

Q2 Results: 98% of evolutionists replied that natural selection is a force.

Sorry, Charlie. Darwin said that natural selection is an event.

Question 3: Is adaptation a force or an event?

Q3 Results: 99% of evolutionists replied that adaptation is a force.

Sorry, Charlie. Darwin said that adaptation is an event.

Conclusion: Given the survey results, why do we give evolutionists so much credit for being smart people?

Is It Time To Start Killing Evolutionists?

Is it time to start killing evolutionists? The answer is, first, no and, second, it will never be time to start killing evoluionists. We understand how infuriating their ignorance and muleheaded stubbornness is but such killing is never justified (see the Bible and The Accidental Vigilante).

However, there may be a lesser form of martialism possible. We are working on this question.

Why Evolutionists Are Stupid Morons In-Depth

In science, you pursue the hypothesis that is potentially provable; that is, there is the possibility of proving it. Proof consists of something that is experimentally repeatable. The so-called proof of evolution is all of biological history.

Well, now, we have two problems:

  1. No one has ever witnessed all of biological history; therefore, we don’t have even a single experiment to begin to build a proof.
  2. If we had a (past-only) time machine and could live billions of years, we could witness all of biological history but we would still only have a single experiment and could not “perform” additional experiments; therefore, we could not establish experimental repeatability and, therefore, could not build a proof.

Now, what evolutionists do in the face of this insurmountable obstacle is, like cheaters often do, to tell a lie. They say:

Well, you see, we are using inductive logic (many instances constitute proof).

The truth is:

Evolutionists use inductive interpretation (many instances inspire an opinion).

The Law of Hermeticism

Here is the formal, erudite statement of the law of hermeticism (hermeticism):

Truth and science are two different things and universal truth is a subset of science and true evolution is not taught in our schools and true creationism is not taught in our churches and the hypothesis of evolution can be tolerated but the theory of evolution should be opposed and, as a matter of truth, everyone should believe in intelligent design, which creationism elaborates; also, even evolutionists believe in intelligent design – the intelligent design of the artificial intelligence of the retroviruses – and, as a matter of science but not truth, the “theory of indeterminate design” replaces evolution, creationism, and intelligent design.