Hermeticism

Aside

“We believe in hermeticism as defined by the “seven keys,” not in the hypothesis of evolution.”
– Dr. Michael Bisconti

Scientific Revolution

The Seven Keys
By Dr. Michael Bisconti

The “Seven Keys” delineate (set forth) a necessarily difficult to understand view of the origin of life, which is held by all lovers of both truth and science.  The “Seven Keys” and the law of hermeticism, which is defined by them, were developed by Dr. Michael Bisconti.

  1. Truth and science are two different things.
  2. Universal truth is a subset of science.
  3. True evolution is not taught in our schools and true creationism is not taught in our churches.
  4. The hypothesis of evolution can be tolerated but the theory of evolution should be opposed.
  5. As a matter of truth, everyone should believe in intelligent design, which creationism elaborates.
  6. Even evolutionists believe in intelligent design – the intelligent design of the artificial intelligence of the retroviruses.
  7. As a matter of science but not truth, the “theory of indeterminate design” replaces evolution, creationism, and intelligent design.

The Law of the Average Mind

The law of the average mind says:

The law of hermeticism, which is explained by the seven keys,
may be too difficult for some people to understand.

Therefore, the law of the average mind requires that we provide the following questions and answers:

  1. Did God create everything?  Yes.
  2. Did God create man?  Yes.
  3. Is evolution a fact?  No.
  4. Is evolution a theory?  No.
  5. Is evolution an hypothesis, which involves insufficient evidence?  Yes.

The Law of Hermeticism

Here is the formal, erudite statement of the law of hermeticism (hermeticism):

Truth and science are two different things and universal truth is a subset of science and true evolution is not taught in our schools and true creationism is not taught in our churches and the hypothesis of evolution can be tolerated but the theory of evolution should be opposed and, as a matter of truth, everyone should believe in intelligent design, which creationism elaborates; also, even evolutionists believe in intelligent design – the intelligent design of the artificial intelligence of the retroviruses – and, as a matter of science but not truth, the “theory of indeterminate design” replaces evolution, creationism, and intelligent design.

True Creationism

This in-depth article was first published by us on an earlier generation of our parent website, the L. F. Nexus, and was orginally titled “Realistic (Phenotypical) Creationism, Yes!.”

Dr. Bisconti is the discoverer of the “realistic (phenotypical) creationism interpretation,” which is based on the “field view description.”

First, evolutionists are inexact because the Theory of Evolution is actually the Hypothesis of Evolution.  Visit our Hypothesis Proof page for an explanation.

Before we talk about creationism, we want to make it clear to everyone that we only disagree with “classical creationism,” NOT “realistic (phenotypical) creationism.”  What is commonly referred to as “creationism” is classical creationism.

Note that classical creationism is 99% correct.

Now, creationists are inexact because the account in Genesis is not a “global view description”: that is, it is not written from the perspective of someone viewing the earth from outer space.

Continue reading