Hermeticism

Aside

“We believe in hermeticism as defined by the “seven keys,” not in the hypothesis of evolution.”
– Dr. Michael Bisconti

Scientific Revolution

The Seven Keys
By Dr. Michael Bisconti

The “Seven Keys” delineate (set forth) a necessarily difficult to understand view of the origin of life, which is held by all lovers of both truth and science.  The “Seven Keys” and the law of hermeticism, which is defined by them, were developed by Dr. Michael Bisconti.

  1. Truth and science are two different things.
  2. Universal truth is a subset of science.
  3. True evolution is not taught in our schools and true creationism is not taught in our churches.
  4. The hypothesis of evolution can be tolerated but the theory of evolution should be opposed.
  5. As a matter of truth, everyone should believe in intelligent design, which creationism elaborates.
  6. Even evolutionists believe in intelligent design – the intelligent design of the artificial intelligence of the retroviruses.
  7. As a matter of science but not truth, the “theory of indeterminate design” replaces evolution, creationism, and intelligent design.

The Law of the Average Mind

The law of the average mind says:

The law of hermeticism, which is explained by the seven keys,
may be too difficult for some people to understand.

Therefore, the law of the average mind requires that we provide the following questions and answers:

  1. Did God create everything?  Yes.
  2. Did God create man?  Yes.
  3. Is evolution a fact?  No.
  4. Is evolution a theory?  No.
  5. Is evolution an hypothesis, which involves insufficient evidence?  Yes.

The Law of Hermeticism

Here is the formal, erudite statement of the law of hermeticism (hermeticism):

Truth and science are two different things and universal truth is a subset of science and true evolution is not taught in our schools and true creationism is not taught in our churches and the hypothesis of evolution can be tolerated but the theory of evolution should be opposed and, as a matter of truth, everyone should believe in intelligent design, which creationism elaborates; also, even evolutionists believe in intelligent design – the intelligent design of the artificial intelligence of the retroviruses – and, as a matter of science but not truth, the “theory of indeterminate design” replaces evolution, creationism, and intelligent design.

True Creationism

This in-depth article was first published by us on an earlier generation of our parent website, the L. F. Nexus, and was orginally titled “Realistic (Phenotypical) Creationism, Yes!.”

Dr. Bisconti is the discoverer of the “realistic (phenotypical) creationism interpretation,” which is based on the “field view description.”

First, evolutionists are inexact because the Theory of Evolution is actually the Hypothesis of Evolution.  Visit our Hypothesis Proof page for an explanation.

Before we talk about creationism, we want to make it clear to everyone that we only disagree with “classical creationism,” NOT “realistic (phenotypical) creationism.”  What is commonly referred to as “creationism” is classical creationism.

Note that classical creationism is 99% correct.

Now, creationists are inexact because the account in Genesis is not a “global view description”: that is, it is not written from the perspective of someone viewing the earth from outer space.

Continue reading

XD: The Theory of Indeterminate Design

First, truth and science are two different things. In the following paragraph, we are talking about science, not truth.

Dr. Michael Bisconti is the discoverer of XD, The Theory of Indeterminate Design. This theory says:

There are one or more intelligences behind the origin of all living things but science doesn’t know whether they are a preternatural intelligence (God) or a naturally occurring artificial intelligence (retroviruses) or a combination of the two and/or some other intelligence or set of intelligences.

Science is limited to universal perception. This is the only theory that is based on universal perception.

Finally, as a matter of truth, not science, we do believe in Intelligent Design, Creationism, and the right to exist of the Hypothesis (not Theory) of Evolution.

True Evolution and True Creationism Can Coexist

First, true evolution is not what is taught in our schools and true creationism is not what is taught in our churches, though what is taught in our schools and churches are approximations of the realistic.

Now, coexistence does not mean that both evolution and creationism are true.  Coexistence does mean that both evolution and creationism, understood in the light of new insights, do not compete for the same place in people’s minds.

How is this possible?

Evolution is a hypothesis, not a theory, and creationism is about the human habitat, not the universe, though God did create the universe.  On this basis, evolution and creationism can coexist.

We, of course, do not believe that evolution will ever be proven and, at the same time, we disagree with the common understanding of Genesis 1 though we do believe that Genesis 1 is to be understood literally.

In short, all of you, evolutionists and creationists, have been imprecise and, as a result, technically, wrong.

Now, to learn why evolution is a hypothesis and not a theory, read Our Main Thesis: “The Hypothesis Proof” and, to learn why the common understanding of creationism has a deficit, read our in-depth article Realistic (Phenotypical) Creationism, Yes!.

Colossus

Today, we unveil “Colossus.”  Colossus is a transdimensional, cloud-hosted, super database cluster containing over one trillion…that’s right, one trillion…that is a “1” followed by twelve “0s”…1,000,000,000,000…pieces of new data that refute the theory of evolution.  To use a cliche, we ain’t in Kansas anymore.

Colossus was created and developed by Dr. Michael Bisconti of Bisconti Technologies, Inc.