Hermeticism

Aside

“We believe in hermeticism as defined by the “seven keys,” not in the hypothesis of evolution.”
– Dr. Michael Bisconti

Scientific Revolution

The Seven Keys
By Dr. Michael Bisconti

The “Seven Keys” delineate (set forth) a necessarily difficult to understand view of the origin of life, which is held by all lovers of both truth and science.  The “Seven Keys” and the law of hermeticism, which is defined by them, were developed by Dr. Michael Bisconti.

  1. Truth and science are two different things.
  2. Universal truth is a subset of science.
  3. True evolution is not taught in our schools and true creationism is not taught in our churches.
  4. The hypothesis of evolution can be tolerated but the theory of evolution should be opposed.
  5. As a matter of truth, everyone should believe in intelligent design, which creationism elaborates.
  6. Even evolutionists believe in intelligent design – the intelligent design of the artificial intelligence of the retroviruses.
  7. As a matter of science but not truth, the “theory of indeterminate design” replaces evolution, creationism, and intelligent design.

The Law of the Average Mind

The law of the average mind says:

The law of hermeticism, which is explained by the seven keys,
may be too difficult for some people to understand.

Therefore, the law of the average mind requires that we provide the following questions and answers:

  1. Did God create everything?  Yes.
  2. Did God create man?  Yes.
  3. Is evolution a fact?  No.
  4. Is evolution a theory?  No.
  5. Is evolution an hypothesis, which involves insufficient evidence?  Yes.

The Law of Hermeticism

Here is the formal, erudite statement of the law of hermeticism (hermeticism):

Truth and science are two different things and universal truth is a subset of science and true evolution is not taught in our schools and true creationism is not taught in our churches and the hypothesis of evolution can be tolerated but the theory of evolution should be opposed and, as a matter of truth, everyone should believe in intelligent design, which creationism elaborates; also, even evolutionists believe in intelligent design – the intelligent design of the artificial intelligence of the retroviruses – and, as a matter of science but not truth, the “theory of indeterminate design” replaces evolution, creationism, and intelligent design.

True Evolution and True Creationism Can Coexist

First, true evolution is not what is taught in our schools and true creationism is not what is taught in our churches, though what is taught in our schools and churches are approximations of the realistic.

Now, coexistence does not mean that both evolution and creationism are true.  Coexistence does mean that both evolution and creationism, understood in the light of new insights, do not compete for the same place in people’s minds.

How is this possible?

Evolution is a hypothesis, not a theory, and creationism is about the human habitat, not the universe, though God did create the universe.  On this basis, evolution and creationism can coexist.

We, of course, do not believe that evolution will ever be proven and, at the same time, we disagree with the common understanding of Genesis 1 though we do believe that Genesis 1 is to be understood literally.

In short, all of you, evolutionists and creationists, have been imprecise and, as a result, technically, wrong.

Now, to learn why evolution is a hypothesis and not a theory, read Our Main Thesis: “The Hypothesis Proof” and, to learn why the common understanding of creationism has a deficit, read our in-depth article Realistic (Phenotypical) Creationism, Yes!.

Our Main Thesis: “The Hypothesis Proof” (True Evolution)

This page presents what Dr. Bisconti refers to as “The Hypothesis Proof.”  Dr. Bisconti is the discoverer of this proof.  (This article was first published on a past generation of the L. F. Nexus Think Tanks website).

Well, after our years of research, we can finally put to rest the debate over the theory of evolution.  Why?  The only way the theory could be proven is if all species of plants and animals and their descendants were studied for billions of years, starting with the beginning of life on earth, so that we could actually see evolution occurring.  Remember:

Even if you saw:

 one species give rise to a new species;

for example (a ridiculous example just to make our point), a dog that gives birth to a flying dog…even if you saw one species give rise to a new species, that would not prove that:

All species gave rise to all subsequent species.

And, remember:

 There is no theory of evolution unless this is true.

So, what is left to fight?

The idea that evolution is a theory.

Continue reading