Evolutionary science promotes the mythical ideas of evolution, adaptation, and natural selection, among others. BOSS (Biological Origins Science) teaches the truth that, instead, there is the evolution construct, adaptation construct, and natural selection construct, which are mental constructs imposed on the biological world and not actual, physical entities.
The proof that evolution, adaptation, and natural selection are imaginary entities is the fact that evolutionary science has never identified physicochemical agents or processes that define these entities. Nevertheless, the corresponding mental constructs, properly termed the “evolution construct,” “adaptation construct,” and “natural selection construct,” are useful in organizing biological history.
We will, for now, treat adaptation as a reality. Evolutionists assume:
Because adaptation has occurred with a few species, it has occurred with all species .
10,000 evolutionists were surveyed by Drone. They were asked 3 questions.
Question 1: Is evolution a force or an event?
Q1 Results: 99.6% of evolutionists replied that evolution is a force.
Sorry, Charlie. Darwin said that evolution is an event.
Question 2: Is natural selection a force or an event?
Q2 Results: 98% of evolutionists replied that natural selection is a force.
Sorry, Charlie. Darwin said that natural selection is an event.
Question 3: Is adaptation a force or an event?
Q3 Results: 99% of evolutionists replied that adaptation is a force.
Sorry, Charlie. Darwin said that adaptation is an event.
Conclusion: Given the survey results, why do we give evolutionists so much credit for being smart people?
Evolutionists stretch the truth. A yellow butterfly gives birth to an orange butterfly (adaptation). Therefore, evolutionists say, “A cow gave birth to a horse (hyper-adaptation).”
Once again, we must remind some ignorant people that:
Adaptation (a new species from an old species) is not evolution (all species from one species).
The dumbest evolutionists will tell you that it doesn’t matter if we call adaptation “evolution.” Such lack of precision is unscientific, which makes these evolutionists unscientific. They are not serious evolutionists. They are casual evolutionists. Don’t waste your time on them.
The origination of a new species from an existing species is called “adaptation,” not “evolution.” The belief in adaptation is harmless and contradicts no hermeticist, creationist, designist, indeterminationist, or biblical belief.
Adaption is defined as the creation of a new species from an existing species where the new species differs in tiny ways from the parent species; for example, an orange butterfly instead of a yellow butterfly. Hyper-adaptation is defined as the creation of a new species from an existing species where the new species differs in huge ways from the parent species; for example, a flying dog instead of a regular dog. No, there are no flying dogs.
In fact, there are no instances of hyper-adaptation. There are reported instances of adaptation, which we have not been able to confirm but, for now, we’ll say they are true reports. In addition, adaptation has been reported to occur an average of only every one hundred thousand years. With adaptation’s track record, the evolutionary timeline should be tens of trillions of years instead of billions of years but that doesn’t fit the geological facts.
Finally, adaptation is not evolution and there is nothing about the concept of adaptation or even hyper-adaptation that conflicts with any hermeticist, creationist, designist, indeterminationist, or biblical truth.